politics

Once, We Were Many

The progress of humanity has taken many forms. From society to faith and religion to exploration and technology, we are beings in movement. We are defined by our movement. And though there are many streams of progress, the general path of man has been a slow, methodical march towards one world. Where we were once millions of families, we were then thousands of tribes, then hundreds of nations, then dozens of empires. And eventually we became a new world and an old. And now, connected by information technology and decades into our first truly global trade market, east and west, are collapsing into one. The journey, millennia in the making, is nearer to that end-one world- then perhaps many of us are willing to admit. That is the natural progress of man. And denying it doesn’t change it any more than drawing the blinds to block out the sun makes it night.

The natural progress of a person, one individual, is different though. By ourselves, we are inherently distrustful of outsiders and susceptible to having our passions raised by those who point blame towards the few among us that don’t fit in. And when our passions are high enough and we hurl that basic human instinct to turn inwards in the face of adversity against the natural progression towards one global society, we create friction. And sometimes if the friction is great enough, we stand still. But the halt is only temporary. Eventually, the tectonic plates of progress move forward, fueled by the man made powers of free markets, trade, technology and innovation. The longer we hold them in place, the more severe and unnatural the opposition, the more violent the eventual movement becomes. History teaches us this.

When economic and racial friction impeded the progress of abolition and the anachronism of slavery existed in post industrial revolution America, the snap back was violent. It cost us over a half a million lives and destroyed the economy of the south for a century. When ultra nationalist fascism existed in the culturally integrated melting pot of Europe, the friction it caused was the most devastating global war in the history of our species. The world lost 28 thousand people a day for six years to that violent end. This is the cost of resistance to the path of humanity. And as constant as the force of progress has been, the friction of that resistance has also been constant. The only variable is how long we allow the friction to halt it. And then, how violent the return to progress is.

ISIS, for the people of Iraq and Syria, is the violent end to a halt of progress hundreds of years in the making. BREXIT is the beginning of another one. And the 2016 U.S. election is another. Yes, the 2016 U.S. elections and ISIS and BREXIT are different flavors of a similarly structured message-trouble is coming, turn inward. And though they may feel like a failure of the liberal or progressive movements to continue the unfettered march towards social progress , they’re not. They are a failure of adherence to conservative principles.

Conservative government principles are about people limiting government through liberties. Not government limiting people through fear. And conservative ideology is not most effective when it halts progress. It’s most effective when it insists that progress is thoughtful and focused. We’ve forgotten those principles. Because we’ve lost our nerve.  And when conservatives lose their nerve,  fundamentalism, that troubled offspring of conservative thought that fills the vacuum created by the absence of courage, seizes us. The return to fundamentalism, is what precedes the pauses to progress that history teaches us, never end well.

I’ve heard, more times than I can count, that the result of the last election was was caused by the Democratic party losing touch with middle America. Well, it’s been a long time since the Democratic party was in touch with middle America. A more likely cause was that it was time for a return to conservative leadership after eight years of progressive executive movement. It’s damn hard to hold the White House for twelve years. And when the opportunity for change revealed itself, it found a people wandering lost among the prairies following voices on microphones over the airwaves and talking heads on their television instead of strong, conservative leaders of character. Absent were the men and women willing to take conservative approaches to solving the world’s problems instead of tucking their heads into the sand and walling off America from the outside world. Courage lives in the future. Fear and weakness live in a desire to return to the safer days of old.

We elected an American fundamentalist message masquerading as a message of strength. And so we shouldn’t be surprised when the team formed to deliver on the promise of that message is laden with American fundamentalists. Perhaps you’d hoped for different. Perhaps you should spend a moment to ask yourself why. Why did you think it would be different than what it’s turning out to be? You might find that perhaps your willingness to accept was less about optimism and principles and more about fear.

If you’re relying on the opposition to keep the surge of American fundamentalism at bay with sensational headlines of “white supremacy” and “misogyny” remember how well that worked in the general election. It’s easy to ignore the opposition. So that’s what America will do. As only a failure of American conservative leadership gives birth to American fundamentalism, so too is it true that only strong American conservative leadership can be its end.

Senate confirmations are coming for the newly selected cabinet of the president elect. The election is won. Silence is consent. And you don’t have any excuses any more to sit idly by and watch the conservative light fade into the distant memory of the American mind.

Be wary of who we trust our society to. Ideas like liberty and equality are exactly that. They are ideas. They are abstracts that have bound our people together. And they are powerful. But they’re not invincible. And they’re only permanent, if we believe them.

The world is watching.

9 replies »

  1. Thank you, from a life long Democrat looking to better understand our current situation from a conservative source that I can stomach. I look forward to furthering my understanding of a more radical (“going to the root or origen”) conservative platform through your blog, as I need this!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thank you for this thoughtful piece. If only our elected officials had the courage to look forward and embrace the inevitable instead of backwards, trying to reclaim the past.

    Like

  3. Sean, I thank you for providing me with such a good example of advocacy with good, reasoned arguments and commentary. I’m surprised that I am saying this because I describe myself as a Yellowdog Democrat.

    Like

  4. “As only a failure of American conservative leadership gives birth to American fundamentalism, so too is it true that only strong American conservative leadership can be its end.”

    I would love to hear your thoughts and feelings on what ‘American conservative leadership’ looks like; what are the ideals and the how would it change the country for the better? Specifically, how would the policies work? Have you witnessed anything like it in your lifetime?

    Like

  5. Again, another progressive who finds your writing intelligent and thoughtful. That is why I am following you, and support your message.

    Like

  6. I’m intrigued and curious. You may find yourself in unexpected company — H.H. the Dalai Lama — http://www.lionsroar.com/watch-the-dalai-lama-break-down-the-illusion-behind-prejudice/# Who would be your Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Chief of Staff selections? Who are the conservative individuals who follow liberty and not fear? The Dalai Lama says that on a fundamental level we are all one. It is our man-made tendency to separate typically out of fear that leads to much suffering. I am yet another progressive; I’m hoping some conservatives will weigh in. I’d truly like to know who are the voices of ‘American conservative leadership’?

    Like

  7. Thoughtful but fundamentally incorrect. There is no historical movement towards one global society.
    Moreover you continue refusing to accept the basis of the election being a rejection of progressive policies.
    Your clarion call to like minded followers does a disservice to our country. Yes, we need a vigilant political minority. But your premise is to be vigilant because the fox is in the henhouse which stokes fear and panders to the progressives whose policies were soundly rejected.

    Always interesting to read your columns.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Your arguments for acceptance of “soundly” rejected progressive policies is dubious Remember: The popular vote was not won by elected Presidential candidate. (Did you interpret the 2008 election results as a “sound rejection of conservative policies”?)

      The concept of debating whether there is a “historical movement towards one global society” would be an interesting one, though. I suspect this would get to the root of many liberal vs. conservative differences.

      Like

  8. Don- Greetings. This is a sincere request. Could you please articulate or refer me to references that articulate conservative policies. Are proposed nominees such as Senator Sessions consistent with these policies? ‘Rule of Law’ is key, and I am concerned that many nominees will not uphold legislation/regulations/rulings. Who might be your nominees for Cabinet positions?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s