Politics

Thoughts on John Brennan

When one takes the time to unpack pulling former CIA director John Brennan’s security clearance, it’s pretty troubling.

Being granted a security clearance, through process, doesn’t give one access to classified information. It gives one eligibility to access. When someone with that eligibility is not acting in an official capacity and does not have a “need to know”, it doesn’t matter how high their clearance level is, they’re not allowed to access even lower level classified information. The “need to know” is a multiplier. A 1 or a 0. No need to know, no access. No consumption of classified material.

John Brennan represented no threat to national security that could not be controlled in means other than revoking a clearance.

There is also a process for revoking a clearance. The common one involves an appeal process. The process can be superseded by the needs of national security, in which case an agency can revoke one’s clearance without appeal. The agency leadership (DOD, Justice, Intelligence) has to do it though.

What the president did, was act on his Constitutional authority as the executive to directly revoke Brennan’s clearance, something that’s never happened before in America. So, in short, the president did something that no one had done before that had no positive impact on national security or the security of classified information.

And it didn’t really hurt Brennan either. John Brennan, at this stage of his life doesn’t need a security clearance. And he comes off looking much better than Trump in the exchange to all outside the Trump base.

So why did he do it?

Well, as best I can tell, and this is what I find most troubling, is to put the rest of the millions of Americans whose livelihood comes from working with the government, on notice. Most people aren’t John Brennan. And most people with a security clearance or even a government issued professional certification, would have to find another way to support their family if it was revoked tomorrow. And I’ve had more than one friend, as a vet, that’s whispered secretly, that they aren’t saying a thing to anyone on anything any more for fear that they would lose their livelihood.

That’s not healthy. Blind adherence to authority is not in anyone’s job description…even in the military.

Yesterday, Admiral Bill McCraven, who I served under in my time on active duty, wrote that it would be an honor to have his own security clearance revoked too, because it would identify him as someone not afraid to criticize the current administration.

I encourage you to read his statements here. (LINK)

Categories: Politics

Tagged as:

5 replies »

  1. Great perspective and background – thanks for sharing. Admiral McRaven’s actions remind me of the old Navy motto: “Non sibi sed patriae” – “Not for self but for country.” #courage

    Like

  2. I have never been a fan of Trump, even when he was a Democrat. I understand the appeal for some, I too have fallen for populists. I guess I just don’t understand the continued, fervent support he engenders. At some point I guess I have expected his supporters to say “okay, that was it, that was the last straw” but it seems like they’re doubling down, continually. I am becoming leery of the crash, when the streak ends.

    People often say “taking it up a notch” to describe powering through to get the job done. That’s the spirit of America as I know it. With Trump if always feels like “how low can you go” followed quickly by “nope, I can do worse…watch this.”

    Like

  3. Thanks for another informative post. Do you have an opinion on Rachel Maddow’s assertion that the reason his clearance was revoked is to prevent him from accessing his own notes from his time as CIA Director if he were called as a witness in the Mueller investigation? She asserts that Trump isn’t only trying to suppress criticism he’s also trying to prevent testimony.

    Like

  4. I didn’t keep my clearance when I retired from the Navy why should he keep one when he no longer is employed by the government?

    Like

    • Unless your investigation expired the day you retired, coincidently, you only lost access. Not your eligibility. If you started a new job that required a clearance it would have been reinstated with a low level authorization. No new investigation until you were up for your next periodic. What happened to Brennan was a reversal of his investigation and a revocation of his eligibility. In a sense saying, the character statements, polygraphs and deep investigation was no longer relevant on the POTUS’ word.

      Like