Culture and Society

Deconstructing Racism: Part 1, Getting Comfortable

If you collapsed the 239 years of America’s existence into a normal day in your life, our African American population would have had the same basic rights as livestock until just after lunch. They would have gained access to equal education and protection of employment and hiring rights by about 8:15 PM, giving them a few hours in the day to catch up to a white western standard of living millennia in the making. While people like me collapsed into our recliners, our work for the day that is American history sufficiently complete to earn my right to watch bad television for a few hours, black America was just getting out the door on a journey to catch up.

Five decades after the legislation that created the modern American social landscape, on the weekend we put aside to celebrate the life and accomplishments of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, we’re about to turn over the presidency of the United States from a black man to a white man for the first time. That process, whether you agree that race is an issue or not, has opened old wounds and perhaps divided us further. Whether or not it should be sufficient, after centuries of slavery and oppression, to just have stopped its legal practice, is what most of the racial political and socio-economic debate really boils down to. But the word that gets thrown around the most is racism. And I think it’s time we unpacked the word a little bit more than we have. Because sometimes it gets in the way. And others its wholly appropriate. Sorting it out though, comes with a bit more understanding of it than we have. Se we’re going to try to gain it.

It’s a big topic. With a lot of emotion. So we’re going to take the whole week to do it. Here goes.

Part 1: Getting Comfortable With a Few Things

I’m a believe it to see it kind of guy. It’s why I write and why I work in the tech industry. But there are plenty of see it to believe it kind of people in the world that don’t see things the way I do. It’s not a bad thing. If we were all abstracts, society would drive off a cliff whistling all the way down. I don’t need to see racism in action myself every day to know it’s out there. And I don’t need to see absolute proof that some level of prejudice plays a role in an act like the ultimate societal failure that is a police shooting. But that doesn’t mean that I should be satisfied with throwing out the word racism as cause for things and then wandering away and hoping my moral outrage is enough to urge change.

Racism is a really broad term. It’s like describing the cause of death for someone who drowns as “water”. It’s not wrong. But it’s insufficient to describe the problem in a way that narrows the forces at play to something we might be able to change for the better.


Change for the better is the point right? It’s not anger and outrage. It’s change.

To change something like the impacts of racism on 21st century America, you need to understand a little bit about what it is that you want to change. And what is just noise. To some degree, racism is noise. Ending it isn’t the end goal. Racial equality is the goal.  Ending racism is a fine start. But it actually won’t solve the problem of our inequality gap. We’ve done enough to hurt that cause for long enough that we can end racism long before we end racial inequality, only to allow the evils of things like generational destitution and voluntary segregation to fuel the subconscious behavior required for more racism. In order to see the whole picture of what we need to change, from both perspectives of the story, you’ve got to get really objective. And you’ve got to get comfortable with a few uncomfortable things.

First, the idea of racism, in a literal sense as an ideology that supports that members of a given race are characterized by inferior qualities is virtually non-existent in America. When people believe it, they have no acceptable avenue to express it. And if they do, they are summarily dismissed from participating in society almost as quickly and thoroughly as murderers or sexual predators. Mel Gibson was nearly thrown out of Hollywood for his despicable racist statements. Roman Polanski was given a standing ovation at the Oscars despite not being allowed in the country because he’s been charged with raping a minor. If you’re wondering where I stand on those issues, I’m not standing and clapping for either. But it’s a telling comparison of how unacceptable overt racist ideology is in America.

The second thing we need to get comfortable admitting is that we all have a caveman brain. Genetic mutations that alter the physical makeup of the human brain usually take about 25,000 years to manifest themselves. Which means that we are all walking around in 21st century America with a brain designed for hunter gatherer, tribal society. That doesn’t mean we should be satisfied with acting on our base instincts as a guide for our behavior, but it’s important to understand the software we’re working with and the tendencies it has if left to its own device.

Lastly, we’ve had diverse ethnic cultures living in America for 400 years. For 350 of those 400 years, about 87%, we purposely excluded, in a focused unique way, people of African descent from full participation and integration into our society. The result of that exclusion is that for the ensuing 13% of our time here, we have remained culturally segregated. And though that segregation is slowly unwinding through normal forces of integration, we are still two groups, whether we like it or not. That’s the price of our intentional discriminatory history. And ignoring that reality is an obstacle to progress towards solving the problems of racial inequality. Believing that identifying that two distinct cultures exist among two racially different people is a racist activity makes the problem of inequality harder to address.

If you combine those three ideas, public racism is not accepted in American society, we have cave man brains and we are still undeniably culturally segregated, we can start to see 21st century racism in America a little clearer. It’s not that it’s gone. It’s just more subtle. And it looks more like the phenomenon of “tribalism” from our past. Which is different from the intentionally, discriminatory subjugation and oppression of the first 350 years of our existence as a people.

It’s not that it’s not a problem. In fact, the hardwired nature of it may make it even more of a problem. But we have to understand that we’re dealing with a fundamentally different thing here. And when you’re digging yourself out of a hole of four centuries of bad behavior, the more subtle headwinds of tribalism can be just crippling enough to keep an entire people down. That downward pressure is the difference between what my friends of color see and feel and what white folks like me see and feel every day. And it’s worth exploring deeper.

–> Tomorrow: Part II: The Science of Tribalism

If you like what you’ve read here, and are interested in supporting our site, please consider visiting our Kickstarter campaign HERE.

6 replies »

  1. Nice to read your thoughts, and glad to see rational thought is still alive. I hope you will be tolerated in Trump’s America.


  2. Good luck with this one Mr. Hughes. You’ve bit into a pretty ripe apple here. I’m looking forward to the rest of the story. Been following your writings for awhile now (and sharing them periodically on facebook – hope that’s okay with you) and I really enjoy your insights. Keep at it, please.

    Been thinking about this white privilege issue a lot as I have several mixed race members of my extended family. I’ve also got some hard-core deniers that refuse to believe that there’s any such thing. They see affirmative action as reverse racism. You can imagine that we get into some rather heated discussions. In any case, I’ve had a little luck with this argument – “remember when you were a kid and the teacher had a few pets in the classroom. How did that make you feel when you acted out and got punished but the pets did the same thing and got only chuckles from the class and the teacher? Or the girls got special privileges that the boys didn’t? Pissed me off, probably did you, too. Now imagine living your whole life like that. Imagine watching white drivers speed through the neighborhood or pull off a rolling stop and get away with it. You get pulled over for simply being in the wrong neighborhood. Imagine being followed around in stores or getting the special attention from the patrol car while you wait for your bus. I’d sure as hell get an attitude that would be a little tough to live with.”

    Doesn’t always carry the day, but it seems to make a few people think a little longer than any other example I’ve been able to think of. Good luck with the writing. I’ll be reading.

    Al Cleland

    On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:50 AM, chartwell west wrote:

    > Sean Patrick Hughes posted: “If you collapsed he 239 years of America’s > existence into a normal day in your life, our African American population > would have had the same basic rights as livestock until just after lunch. > They would have gained access to equal education and protection ” >


  3. Liking your approach. I have not actually seen it deconstructed this particular way, being able to put the time span in a way people can relate to. Something similar happened to me as I have been studying the issue in the past year, is that being born in 1963, my school experience was much different than African-Americans. Some areas of the south shut down their private schools rather than desegregate. Going to school as a political statement, I am not sure that is something whites can relate to. And the courage it took to get educated when it might mean severe physical punishment or death. That is still the plight of many girls in the world. looking forward to see where your argument goes!